Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.
I wholeheartedly agree with Bruce Allen (like I usually do). I didn’t like Robertson even before he took office. I remember the Christmas holidays of ’08 when he first got elected Mayor. A slightly unexpected snowstorm hit Vancouver and the streets were just covered in heaps of snow. He was no where to be found or to be made reachable. He was enjoying his winter vacation before taking office. From that minor incident, I knew this guy is not the type that would put the city first. It has become quite apparent that he is self-serving and autocratic.
Oh yes! Remember the embarrassing skytrain incident with Robertson even before the election? He tried to deflect his fare evasion by staging some complaint against the transit system. Attempting to divert the fact that he was evading his fare by pointing another issue about the ‘unfairness’ of the system. Robertson basically got elected because it was a two horse race between him and Ladner.
Robertson inherited the Olympic games and a well-run city from an outgoing paraplegic mayor, Sam Sullivan, who showed way more heart and sensible service to the city.
Enough about Robertson. The Chief VPD, Jim Chu, also has some explaining to do. Poor and incompetent Police Intelligence to blame? I’m not only referring to their failure to control the crowd, but their inability to predict the expected and speculate the magnitude of a post-game riot–win or lose. This cat was too frail to do anything to contain the mice problem. All they could do is just let the mice run amok until they all slowly retreated back into the holes they came from.
Last night’s gathering was a perfect opportunity for anarchists and thieves to plan and execute their heist. And most of the idiots who got caught up and on cameras were stupid teenage kids taking souvenirs just for the fun of it.
And don’t expect too much after the fact. All this talk of “We’re going to identify all these perpetrators and charge them to the fullest extent of the law.” Yeah, okay. Sounds like an uphill battle. Actually, it is an uphill battle. Getting the courts in this province to impose the law is as tough as the Canucks winning the Stanley Cup.
So, will heads roll? I doubt it. Robertson won’t resign. He will have to be voted out in the next one (if he’s running again.) And for Chief Chu, I don’t think there’s anyone else that could step up and fill his role. That’s it, folks. And there you have it, Vancouver’s ‘finest’.
I must say, I have been hugely disappointed with my favourite news talk radio: CKNW. First Christy Clark, whom I thought gave up politics and went into broadcast media, gave up her show on CKNW to return to politics to run in the Premier race. And she won! Much thanks to her popularity on the Christy Clark Show. I must admit, I wasn’t a fan of her views and takes. I would credit the success of her program to her remarkable radio voice. Like wow!
Anyhow, what has been disappointing me about the radio station is how they swing from side to side like media whores! Oh right, that’s their job! First, they jumped on Vander Zalm’s bandwagon when he fought and successfully challenged the HST to bring us the upcoming referendum; then they come across some UBC Law student with Econ background, named Chris Thompson, with a video that was his initiation into the Liberal party if anything. I heard the host (I think it was Bill Goodman?) commending and applauding this kid on a “job well done”.
Then callers phoned in complimenting and congratulating this kid for setting the facts straight! I didn’t rush to watch the video right away. But it made me wonder is there some underlying principle, mechanism, calculation that could make this possible? Is paying HST on pretty much everything we consume is better for jobs and the economy, including our personal pocketbooks?
Don’t see a video? Simply refresh your browser.
As the weeks draw nearer to the referendum date (which is just shortly after our Canucks win the Stanley Cup), I have been wrestling with what I should vote come June 13-July 22. (Yup, it’s a mail-in referendum.) Increasingly, television ads and more programming on CKNW are providing a stronger voice in favour of the HST. Not to mention the 2-point reduction in the HST rate as announced by Premier Christy Clark. *shudder*
All of sudden, fightHST side seems to be losing its fight, its luster. Or is it?
The pro-HST ads boast: “HST: Good for jobs. HST: Good for BC.”
Hmm… Okay, how so?
Well, for starters, go to their website to learn more: www.hstinbc.ca and decide for yourself.
If trying to make sense of the numbers and their argument is intimidating to you, you can opt to watch their stickman videos instead.
Like seriously, these stickman videos are made for elementary school kids!
Okay, so I come from a family of engineers and bankers, but somehow I was asleep when God was giving out the math gene. I was, however, highly present when He gave out logic, good judgment, and common sense.
You don’t have to be an economist to figure out everything costs more for the consumer under the HST. The argument for is that this tax shift will ultimately benefit the consumer down the road because when businesses will pass on their savings by reducing prices and/or by hiring more workers.
Uh huh. Right….
So back to my disappointment with CKNW, and among callers and youtube comments boasting and praising economists and their superior intellect to understand the mathematical complexities of something so simple such as a tax shift from businesses to consumers. And the radio host was inundated with the smoke and mirrors to challenge the logic behind the message.
First of all, Chris Thompson is neither an economist nor a lawyer. He is a student. Albeit with an Honours degree. Now studying law. Clearly, here’s a young man who is proud of his academic achievements… But nonetheless, he’s just a student with no real professional training so he really has no merit to make much of a dent in the debate. And if you haven’t seen the video already, there isn’t any real substance. Just, well smokes and mirrors.
Anyways, my point is, don’t be fooled by titles. Or intimidated by numbers. You don’t need to be present during the handing out of math genes to sniff out a government’s desperate taxing schemes.
The funny thing in a capital society is this high regard for economists. Woooo…. Economists….
Economists use applied numbers to explain something so theoretically implausible thus it usually never happens in reality. Basically economists are crappy fortune tellers because they try to explain/predict the future using shallow and simplistic theoretical equations that makes them wrong every time. Why? Because the laws of probability and chance, among other variables in the equation is way beyond anybody.
Seriously, don’t buy into an explanation as fact just because it came from a perceived “expert”. Even if you don’t understand it. And especially if it goes against your personal judgment and common sense.
To learn more and to come to your own conclusions on this political mess, read both sides…. But don’t stop there! Read from other general sources like Wikipedia. Look up some economics terminologies. Visit the CRA site. Learn more about what the VAT really is.
As for me, I’m still researching before I come to a conclusion. My thoughts so far: there will be winners and losers under the HST. It just depends which end of the spectrum you fall under.
I will leave you with a few links… You will have to find more on your own. And if you’re intellectually lazy, well, there’s the stickman videos for ya.
Here they are:
The man who picked the first bone: Bill Vander Zalm’s fighthst.com
**The FightHST Debate Tour will be at the SFU Wosk Centre for Dialogue today at 7:30PM.
Also check out taxpayer.com. Also find articles from Vander Zalm’s report that was debunked in Thompson’s video, including this one by economist, David Murell, Ph D: Impact of HST ON BC.pdf by
Chris Thompson’s passionate site all about how wonderful the HST is: www.fightfighthst.com
Here’s the link to the BC government site (with all the stickman videos for those who don’t want to read): www.hstinbc.ca
And lastly, where would the world be without Wikipedia? Here’s an article on the Value Added Tax (VAT) (which is the same tax as the HST).
“Animals in captivity debate refueled” was the latest headline sparked by a recent death of a baby beluga whale, Nala, at the Vancouver’s Aquarium. This is the seventh baby whale to have died at the aquarium. This death has also prompted more calls to end the ongoing captivity of whales and dolphin in Stanley Park. The cause of the death was an “accumulation of fluid in the lungs”, and also found were two small stones and a penny swallowed by the baby whale.
A group called No Whales in Captivity is hoping that the Vancouver Park Board will allow Vancouverites to vote on the issue of keeping whales in captivity by including the referendum question on the ballot in the next civic election in 2011.
Interestingly, the debate was rather split down the line among callers to the CKNW radio show. I was fascinated to hear the rationale from those who sided in keeping animals in captivity. Their arguments for were either for education or for (affordable) entertainment. One caller cited the educational value by allowing children to see these animals live in person so that they can aspire to working with animals later on–particularly endangered species. Another caller justified the need for keeping the whales because most families could not afford the whale watching experience offered by local tour companies. The cost to do so could be upwards to a thousand dollars per family. A thousand dollars for a family trip whale watching may actually be cheaper than taking the family to watch the Canucks play!
Whatever the excuses are, I don’t see any real justification to keeping any animal in captivity. Perhaps it’s because I never was astonished as a kid being at the zoo or aquarium. Actually, the aquarium is pretty cool, but that’s about my excitement towards these tours. I remember dreading field trips to the zoo as a child. I didn’t care to see the lions, rhinos, elephants, crocs… Nothing piqued my curiosity. I was more intrigued watching them on the wildlife documentaries on TV than seeing them in the flesh lying in one spot at the zoo. There is nothing exciting and majestic about seeing animals in artificial environments. And how does all this translate to saving the animals?
June 22 was two years since George Carlin passed away. This recent debate reminded me of stand-up he did on “saving the planet”. I couldn’t agree more.
It’s official! BC’s Information and Privacy Commissioner, David Loukidelis, has ruled against Vancouver’s Barwatch Program and to cease the scanning of patron’s IDs as a condition for entering the establishments. The Commissioner Office, however, is leaving the door open for consultations with Barwatch.
Here’s a fun video that was thrown in a forum by a number of frustrated designers. Myself, though not an artist but a consultant, I do understand their frustrations. In this tough economy, many firms are not hiring and rather outsourcing for small projects and piecemeal work. Many artists are looking to find and juggle a number of small projects and contract work to stay afloat. For this reason, piecemeal work should expect a higher hourly remuneration than for ongoing work. But often many clients are small business owners or entrepreneurs with little resources.
So, I went to see Diana Krall last Thursday night. What can I say, amazing singer, pianist, and band… but the overall experience was lousy. I had a hunch that it was going to be a bad experience and I was right. A week prior, I saw Diana Krall featured on her husband’s show (Spectacle: Elvis Costello With…) as a guest.
Some other arguments I’ve tallied since my last post on this issue.
In large rural constituencies, it is possible that most or all elected MLAs may come from a major town within that riding. Why? Because most of the voters would come from the same town. The same could apply to city constituencies like in Vancouver, where west side residents are more likely to vote than eastsiders, for example. Thus, electing city councilors from their locale. (This is the same argument of ‘western alienation’ that Western Canada has been clamouring for years!)
The Citizens’ Assembly has proposed a new proportional electoral system for B.C. It’s BC-STV, a version of the Single Transferable Vote system. The Assembly claims that It could be a form of proportional representation that could improve electoral democracy and fairness.
According to the Assembly:
Under the proportional BC-STV system, voters rank candidates by numbers on the ballot paper. BC-STV is designed to make every vote count, and to reflect voters’ support for candidates and parties as fairly as possible. It was proposed by the Assembly after almost 10 months of study, research and debate, plus 50 public hearings and 1,603 written submissions from the public.
follow me on Twitter
Recent Comments